Behavioural Change Toolkit · Frameworks

COM-B and the Behaviour Change Wheel

You need to know why a behaviour isn't happening before you design anything

The workhorse of this toolkit. Developed by Susan Michie and colleagues at UCL. If you learn one framework, learn this one — it’s the only widely-used model that connects diagnosis to intervention choice rather than leaving you to guess.


The core claim

For any behaviour to happen, three things must be present:

B = f(C, O, M)

  Sub-type Plain English Sounds like
Capability Physical Skills, strength, stamina “I’ve never used anything like it”
  Psychological Knowledge, mental capacity, decision-making “I don’t understand when I’m supposed to use it”
Opportunity Physical Environment, time, resources, access “I don’t have a licence” / “there isn’t time”
  Social Norms, what peers do, cultural cues “Nobody on my team bothers”
Motivation Reflective Plans, beliefs, intentions, evaluations “I don’t think it’s better than the old way”
  Automatic Habit, emotion, impulse, desire “I just do it the old way without thinking”

Remove any one and the behaviour stops. This is why training-only rollouts fail: they fix Capability while Opportunity and Motivation are untouched.


Why this matters when advising leaders

Executives default to two interventions: tell them (Education) and train them (Training). Both target Capability. In most tech and process rollouts, Capability is the smallest barrier. The real blockers are:

  • Physical Opportunity — the new process takes 4 minutes longer and nobody removed anything from the day
  • Social Opportunity — their manager still accepts the old format
  • Automatic Motivation — 11 years of muscle memory

Bringing a leader a COM-B breakdown reframes “our people are resistant” into “we’ve built a system that makes the right thing harder.” That’s a much better conversation, and it puts the fix inside the leader’s control.


The nine intervention functions

Once you know the barrier, this tells you what kind of intervention can work.

Function What it does Best for
Education Increase knowledge/understanding Psych. Capability
Persuasion Stimulate feeling to prompt action Reflective + Automatic Motivation
Incentivisation Create expectation of reward Reflective + Automatic Motivation
Coercion Create expectation of punishment/cost Motivation (use sparingly — see below)
Training Impart skills Physical + Psych. Capability
Restriction Rules limiting the alternative Physical + Social Opportunity
Environmental restructuring Change the physical/social context Physical + Social Opportunity, Automatic Motivation
Modelling Provide an example to imitate Social Opportunity, Automatic Motivation
Enablement Increase means / reduce barriers beyond the above Anything

The mapping shortcut

Physical Capability      → Training, Enablement
Psychological Capability → Education, Training, Enablement
Physical Opportunity     → Restriction, Environmental restructuring, Enablement
Social Opportunity       → Restriction, Env. restructuring, Modelling, Enablement
Reflective Motivation    → Education, Persuasion, Incentivisation, Coercion
Automatic Motivation     → Persuasion, Incentivisation, Coercion, Env. restructuring, Modelling, Enablement

Pin this. It is the single most useful table in the toolkit — go straight from your diagnosis to a shortlist.

On Coercion

It works, fast, and it is almost always the wrong first move in a workplace culture change. It produces compliance without commitment, kills discretionary effort, and teaches people to hide problems. Reserve it for genuine safety or regulatory non-negotiables, and only after you’ve made the right behaviour easy. If a leader reaches for it early, that’s usually a signal they’ve skipped diagnosis.


The seven policy categories

The organisational levers that deliver the functions: communication/marketing · guidelines · fiscal measures · regulation · legislation · environmental/social planning · service provision.

In a corporate setting, translate as: comms, policy & SOPs, budget & incentives, mandated controls, contractual terms, workspace & system design, and what the shared services function actually offers.


APEASE — the filter that kills bad ideas politely

Score every candidate intervention 1–5:

Criterion The question
Acceptability Will the people affected — and the stakeholders — tolerate this?
Practicality Can we actually deliver it with the people and time we have?
Effectiveness Is there evidence or reason to think it will move the behaviour?
Affordability Can we fund it, including the ongoing cost?
Side-effects / spillover What else does this change? What gets worse?
Equity Does it disadvantage any group, shift or site?

Use APEASE as a political tool

When an exec has a pet intervention you think is weak, don’t argue with it. Score it against APEASE alongside three others in front of the group. The framework does the disagreeing for you, and the conversation stays about criteria rather than about you.


Worked example — new CRM rollout

Behaviour: Account managers log every client call in the CRM within 24 hours.

Component Finding Verdict
Physical Capability All have laptops, can type ✅ Fine
Psych. Capability Know how, but unclear what counts as a “call” ⚠️ Minor gap
Physical Opportunity Logging takes 6 min; no time removed from the day 🔴 Major
Social Opportunity Top-billing AM openly refuses; team follows 🔴 Major
Reflective Motivation Believe it’s surveillance, not sales support 🔴 Major
Automatic Motivation 9 years of a spreadsheet habit ⚠️ Real

Wrong response: more training, more emails, a dashboard of shame.

COM-B-led response:

  1. Env. restructuring — cut the form to 4 fields; mobile voice-to-text; auto-populate from calendar (Physical Opportunity)
  2. Modelling — get the top-billing AM into the design, not the firing line; publish their pipeline gains (Social Opportunity)
  3. Persuasion + Enablement — the CRM feeds them a warm-lead list; reframe from reporting to receiving (Reflective Motivation)
  4. Education — 1-page “what counts” card (Psych. Capability)
  5. Env. restructuring — the Monday pipeline meeting runs off the CRM only. No CRM entry, no discussion. (Automatic Motivation — new cue)

Note that #5 does more than any amount of comms, and costs nothing.


When this is the wrong tool


Do this next

Barrier Analysis — COM-B Interview Guide to gather the evidence → Intervention Design Worksheet to convert diagnosis into action → Behavioural Diagnosis Canvas for the one-page version

← Back to the Behavioural Change Toolkit

Last updated: 11 August 2026