Resource Management
Resource Management
Resource Management
Managing people, skills, capacity, and utilisation across the portfolio to ensure resources are allocated effectively to priority investments.
Portfolio Resource Management
Portfolio resource management ensures the right people with the right skills are allocated to the highest priority work, maximising delivery capacity and capability across the portfolio.
Resource Management Objectives
| Objective |
Description |
| Optimise allocation |
Assign resources to highest value work |
| Balance capacity |
Match demand to available capacity |
| Develop capability |
Build skills for future needs |
| Improve utilisation |
Maximise productive use of resources |
| Reduce conflicts |
Minimise resource contention |
| Enable planning |
Inform prioritisation decisions |
Resource Management Cycle
flowchart LR
A[Demand
Forecast] --> B[Capacity
Assessment]
B --> C[Gap
Analysis]
C --> D[Resource
Allocation]
D --> E[Monitor &
Adjust]
E --> A
classDef blue fill:#108BB9,stroke:none,color:#fff
class A,B,C,D,E blue
| Phase |
Activities |
| Demand Forecast |
Collect resource requirements from investments |
| Capacity Assessment |
Understand available capacity by skill |
| Gap Analysis |
Identify shortfalls and surplus |
| Allocation |
Assign resources to investments |
| Monitor |
Track utilisation, adjust as needed |
Capacity Planning
Capacity Model
| Element |
Description |
| Gross capacity |
Total available hours/days |
| Productive capacity |
Less holidays, training, admin |
| Committed capacity |
Allocated to approved work |
| Available capacity |
Remaining for new work |
Capacity Calculation
Gross Capacity: 220 days/year per FTE
Less:
- Annual leave: 25 days
- Public holidays: 8 days
- Training/development: 5 days
- Admin/meetings: 10 days
- Sick leave (avg): 5 days
- Buffer: 7 days
= Productive Capacity: 160 days/year (73%)
Capacity Dashboard
| Resource Pool |
Headcount |
Productive Days |
Committed |
Available |
Utilisation |
| Project Managers |
8 |
1,280 |
1,100 |
180 |
86% |
| Business Analysts |
12 |
1,920 |
1,750 |
170 |
91% |
| Developers |
20 |
3,200 |
2,800 |
400 |
88% |
| Testers |
10 |
1,600 |
1,400 |
200 |
88% |
| Total |
50 |
8,000 |
7,050 |
950 |
88% |
Demand Management
Demand Sources
| Source |
Timing |
Certainty |
| In-flight projects |
Now |
High |
| Approved pipeline |
0-3 months |
High |
| Business cases in progress |
3-6 months |
Medium |
| Strategic initiatives |
6-12 months |
Low |
| BAU/support |
Ongoing |
Medium |
Demand vs Capacity View
| Period |
Demand (Days) |
Capacity (Days) |
Gap |
Status |
| Q1 |
2,100 |
2,000 |
-100 |
Over |
| Q2 |
1,900 |
2,000 |
+100 |
OK |
| Q3 |
2,200 |
1,800 |
-400 |
Over |
| Q4 |
1,700 |
2,000 |
+300 |
OK |
Managing Over-Demand
| Option |
Description |
Considerations |
| Prioritise |
Defer lower priority work |
Stakeholder impact |
| Contractors |
Bring in temporary resource |
Cost, onboarding |
| Overtime |
Increase hours |
Sustainability, quality |
| Efficiency |
Reduce effort per deliverable |
Feasibility |
| Descope |
Reduce scope of work |
Business impact |
Skills Management
Skills Inventory
| Skill |
Required |
Current |
Gap |
Actions |
| Cloud architecture |
5 |
3 |
2 |
Hire, train |
| Agile delivery |
15 |
12 |
3 |
Training |
| Data analytics |
8 |
5 |
3 |
Hire |
| Change management |
4 |
4 |
0 |
Maintain |
| Legacy systems |
3 |
6 |
+3 |
Transition |
Skills Matrix
| Person |
PM |
BA |
Dev |
Test |
Agile |
Cloud |
| Alice |
Expert |
Competent |
- |
- |
Expert |
Competent |
| Bob |
- |
Expert |
Competent |
- |
Competent |
- |
| Carol |
- |
- |
Expert |
Competent |
Expert |
Expert |
| David |
Competent |
- |
- |
Expert |
Competent |
- |
Skill Levels
| Level |
Description |
| Expert |
Can lead and coach others |
| Competent |
Works independently |
| Developing |
Needs supervision |
| Awareness |
Basic understanding only |
Resource Allocation
Allocation Principles
| Principle |
Application |
| Priority-based |
Higher priority work gets first call |
| Skill match |
Right skills for the work |
| Continuity |
Avoid unnecessary churn |
| Development |
Include stretch opportunities |
| Balance |
Spread load across team |
| Buffer |
Reserve capacity for urgent needs |
Allocation Process
flowchart LR
A[Request
Received] --> B[Assess
Requirements]
B --> C[Check
Availability]
C --> D{Available?}
D -->|Yes| E[Allocate]
D -->|No| F[Negotiate/
Escalate]
E --> G[Confirm &
Track]
F --> G
classDef blue fill:#108BB9,stroke:none,color:#fff
class A,B,C,D,E,F,G blue
Resource Request Template
| Field |
Content |
| Project/Programme |
Name of investment |
| Role required |
Job role/skill needed |
| Effort |
Days/weeks/FTE |
| Start date |
When needed |
| Duration |
How long for |
| Skills required |
Specific skills |
| Location |
On-site/remote |
| Priority |
Portfolio priority |
Utilisation Management
Utilisation Targets
| Role |
Target |
Acceptable Range |
| Project Managers |
85% |
80-90% |
| Delivery resources |
80% |
75-85% |
| Specialists |
70% |
65-80% |
| Managers |
60% |
50-70% |
Utilisation Monitoring
| Person |
Planned |
Actual |
Variance |
Action |
| Alice |
85% |
95% |
+10% |
Review load |
| Bob |
80% |
75% |
-5% |
OK |
| Carol |
80% |
60% |
-20% |
Reallocate |
| David |
85% |
85% |
0% |
OK |
Addressing Issues
| Issue |
Response |
| Over-utilisation |
Review priorities, add support, defer work |
| Under-utilisation |
Reallocate, bring forward work, training |
| Skill mismatch |
Training, reassignment, hiring |
| Conflicts |
Prioritisation, negotiation, escalation |
Resource Forecasting
Rolling Forecast
| Resource Pool |
M1 |
M2 |
M3 |
M4 |
M5 |
M6 |
| Demand |
100 |
110 |
120 |
115 |
105 |
100 |
| Capacity |
100 |
100 |
100 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
| Gap |
0 |
-10 |
-20 |
-10 |
0 |
+5 |
Scenario Planning
| Scenario |
Assumption |
Impact |
| Base case |
Current demand and capacity |
Manageable |
| High demand |
+20% new work approved |
Shortfall Q2-Q3 |
| Attrition |
10% turnover |
Skills gaps |
| Delayed hiring |
3-month recruitment delay |
Extended pressure |
Resource Conflicts
Conflict Resolution
| Priority |
Criteria |
| 1 |
Strategic priority of investment |
| 2 |
Contractual/regulatory deadlines |
| 3 |
Financial impact of delay |
| 4 |
Dependencies on other work |
| 5 |
First-come first-served |
Escalation Path
| Level |
Decision Maker |
Criteria |
| 1 |
Resource Manager |
Same priority, same programme |
| 2 |
Programme Manager |
Cross-project within programme |
| 3 |
PMO Lead |
Cross-programme |
| 4 |
Portfolio Board |
Strategic/significant impact |
Workforce Planning
Strategic Workforce Plan
| Capability |
Current |
Future Need |
Gap |
Strategy |
| Digital skills |
20 |
35 |
15 |
Hire + train |
| Legacy systems |
15 |
8 |
-7 |
Transition |
| Data/Analytics |
5 |
12 |
7 |
Hire |
| Agile delivery |
10 |
25 |
15 |
Train |
Sourcing Options
| Option |
Best For |
Lead Time |
Cost |
| Permanent hire |
Core, long-term skills |
3-6 months |
Medium |
| Contract |
Specialist, temporary |
2-4 weeks |
High |
| Outsource |
Non-core, commodity |
1-3 months |
Variable |
| Train existing |
Future capability |
3-12 months |
Low |
| Graduate/intern |
Future pipeline |
6-12 months |
Low |
Reporting
Resource Reports
| Report |
Audience |
Frequency |
| Capacity dashboard |
PMO, Managers |
Weekly |
| Utilisation report |
PMO, HR |
Monthly |
| Skills gap analysis |
Leadership |
Quarterly |
| Forecast |
Portfolio Board |
Monthly |
| Conflict log |
PMO |
Weekly |
Key Metrics
| Metric |
Target |
Current |
Status |
| Overall utilisation |
80-85% |
87% |
Amber |
| Skills coverage |
>90% |
85% |
Amber |
| Forecast accuracy |
>85% |
82% |
Amber |
| Conflict resolution |
<5 days |
4 days |
Green |
| Time to fill |
<30 days |
28 days |
Green |
Common Challenges
| Challenge |
Mitigation |
| Invisible demand |
Centralised demand capture |
| Hero culture |
Enforce sustainable utilisation |
| Skills silos |
Cross-training, rotation |
| Last-minute requests |
Advance planning process |
| Poor data |
Time recording, regular updates |
| Political allocation |
Priority-based process |
Resource Management Checklist
Setup
Ongoing
Last updated: 13 January 2026