Work Package
Formal delegation of work from a Project Manager to a Team Manager, defining what needs to be delivered, how, and within what constraints.
Work Package
A Work Package is the formal mechanism for delegating work from a Project Manager to a Team Manager or team member, defining what products need to be delivered, within what constraints, and to what quality standards.
Purpose
The Work Package:
- Formally delegates authority to deliver
- Defines scope of work clearly
- Sets constraints and tolerances
- Specifies quality expectations
- Establishes reporting requirements
- Enables parallel workstreams
Work Package Contents
Essential Elements
| Element |
Description |
| Work Package ID |
Unique identifier |
| Description |
What work is being delegated |
| Products |
Products to be delivered |
| Constraints |
Time, cost, scope boundaries |
| Tolerances |
Permitted variance |
| Interfaces |
Dependencies and handoffs |
| Reporting |
When and what to report |
| Approval |
How products will be accepted |
Work Package Structure
flowchart TD
A[Work Package] --> B[Products]
A --> C[Constraints]
A --> D[Interfaces]
A --> E[Controls]
B --> F[Product Descriptions]
B --> G[Quality Criteria]
C --> H[Time]
C --> I[Cost]
C --> J[Scope]
D --> K[Dependencies]
D --> L[Handoffs]
E --> M[Reporting]
E --> N[Tolerances]
classDef blue fill:#108BB9,stroke:none,color:#fff
class A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N blue
Work Package Template
| Field |
Content |
| Work Package ID |
WP-001 |
| Work Package Name |
User Interface Development |
| Project |
Customer Portal Enhancement |
| Stage |
Stage 2 - Development |
| Team Manager |
Jane Smith |
| Date Issued |
15 Jan 2026 |
| Target Completion |
28 Feb 2026 |
Products to Deliver
| Product ID |
Product Name |
Product Description |
| P-101 |
Login Screen |
See PD-101 |
| P-102 |
Dashboard |
See PD-102 |
| P-103 |
User Profile Page |
See PD-103 |
| P-104 |
Unit Test Suite |
See PD-104 |
Constraints
| Constraint Type |
Constraint |
| Time |
Must complete by 28 Feb 2026 |
| Cost |
Budget of £25,000 |
| Scope |
Products listed above only |
| Resources |
Team of 3 developers |
| Technical |
Must use React framework |
| Dependencies |
API endpoints available by 20 Jan |
Tolerances
| Dimension |
Tolerance |
| Time |
+5 days / -0 days |
| Cost |
+£2,500 / -£2,500 (10%) |
| Scope |
No change without approval |
| Quality |
All acceptance criteria must be met |
Interfaces and Dependencies
| Input |
Source |
Required By |
| API specifications |
Technical Architect |
15 Jan |
| UI design mockups |
Design Team |
15 Jan |
| Test data |
QA Team |
20 Jan |
| Access credentials |
IT Operations |
15 Jan |
Outputs/Handoffs
| Output |
Recipient |
Due Date |
| Completed code |
QA Team |
25 Feb |
| Technical documentation |
Operations |
28 Feb |
| Deployment package |
Release Team |
28 Feb |
Dependencies
| Dependency |
Type |
Impact if Delayed |
| API endpoints |
Predecessor |
Cannot start integration |
| Design approval |
Predecessor |
Cannot finalise UI |
| Test environment |
Resource |
Cannot test |
| Security review |
Successor |
Delays release |
Reporting Requirements
Progress Reporting
| Report Type |
Frequency |
Content |
| Checkpoint report |
Weekly |
Progress, issues, forecast |
| Issue escalation |
As needed |
Issues outside tolerance |
| Product handover |
On completion |
Quality check results |
Checkpoint Report Content
| Section |
Content |
| Period |
Reporting dates |
| Progress |
Products completed, in progress |
| Quality |
Results of quality activities |
| Issues |
Problems encountered |
| Forecast |
Expected completion |
| Escalations |
Items for PM attention |
Quality Requirements
Quality Expectations
| Aspect |
Requirement |
| Standards |
Must comply with coding standards v2.1 |
| Testing |
Unit test coverage >80% |
| Review |
Code review by senior developer |
| Documentation |
Inline comments, README files |
| Acceptance |
Product Owner sign-off |
Quality Methods
| Method |
When Applied |
| Code review |
Before merge to main branch |
| Unit testing |
During development |
| Integration testing |
After API integration |
| User acceptance |
Before handover |
Approval Process
Work Package Approval
flowchart LR
A[PM Creates
Work Package] --> B[Team Manager
Review]
B --> C{Accepted?}
C -->|Yes| D[Work
Begins]
C -->|No| E[Negotiate/
Adjust]
E --> A
classDef blue fill:#108BB9,stroke:none,color:#fff
class A,B,C,D,E blue
Product Approval
| Step |
Responsibility |
| Product complete |
Team Manager confirms |
| Quality check |
As per quality method |
| Handover |
To recipient/PM |
| Acceptance |
PM signs off |
Work Package Authorisation
Agreement Checklist
Before accepting a Work Package, the Team Manager should confirm:
| Check |
Verified |
| Products clearly defined? |
☐ |
| Quality criteria understood? |
☐ |
| Constraints realistic? |
☐ |
| Tolerances appropriate? |
☐ |
| Dependencies identified? |
☐ |
| Resources available? |
☐ |
| Risks acceptable? |
☐ |
| Reporting clear? |
☐ |
| Field |
PM |
Team Manager |
| Name |
|
|
| Signature |
|
|
| Date |
|
|
Managing Work Packages
Work Package Register
| WP ID |
Name |
Team Manager |
Start |
Due |
Status |
RAG |
| WP-001 |
UI Development |
J Smith |
15 Jan |
28 Feb |
In Progress |
Green |
| WP-002 |
API Integration |
M Jones |
20 Jan |
15 Feb |
In Progress |
Amber |
| WP-003 |
Data Migration |
P Brown |
01 Feb |
28 Feb |
Not Started |
Green |
| WP-004 |
Testing |
S Wilson |
15 Feb |
15 Mar |
Not Started |
Green |
Status Tracking
| Status |
Meaning |
| Not Started |
Work Package issued but not commenced |
| In Progress |
Work actively being performed |
| On Hold |
Paused due to dependency/issue |
| Complete |
All products delivered and accepted |
| Cancelled |
Work Package withdrawn |
Work Package Closure
Closure Activities
| Activity |
Description |
| Product handover |
All products delivered |
| Quality confirmation |
Quality records complete |
| Lessons captured |
Lessons learned documented |
| Resources released |
Team reassigned |
| PM acceptance |
Formal sign-off |
Closure Confirmation
| Element |
Confirmed |
| All products delivered? |
☐ |
| Quality criteria met? |
☐ |
| Documentation complete? |
☐ |
| Handovers completed? |
☐ |
| Issues closed/transferred? |
☐ |
| Lessons captured? |
☐ |
Common Issues
| Issue |
Prevention |
| Unclear scope |
Detailed product descriptions |
| Missing dependencies |
Thorough interface analysis |
| Unrealistic constraints |
Team Manager input before issue |
| Poor quality |
Clear quality criteria |
| Late escalation |
Regular checkpoints |
| Scope creep |
Firm change control |
Work Package Checklist
Before Issuing
During Delivery
At Closure
Last updated: 13 January 2026